[Asterisk-Users] FW: NuFone Update: DIDs

[Matt]

Indeed... I just don't understand Nufone... we provide VoIP
services... and have a contract inplace with our CLEC, we also have
backup sources for numbers, LD termination, etc.   No backup plan =
BAD!


On 4/28/06, Kerry Garrison <support at techdatapros.com> wrote:
>
> AMEN!!
>
> Any consultant that DOESNT take this into consideration should stick to
> installing Windows and calling themselves an IT "Expert".
>
> You can screw up someone's network, mess up a workstation, hose their email,
> but you break someone's telephone service there will be hell to pay.
>
> Kerry Garrison
> Director of Technical Services
> Tech Data Pros - Orange County's Mobile IT Service Provider
> (949) 502-7819 x200 - kerryg at techdatapros.com
> http://www.techdatapros.com
>
>
>  ________________________________
>  From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf
> Of Lacy Moore - Aspendora
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 4:39 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FW: NuFone Update: DIDs
>
>
>
> Exactly why I chose to go with a PRI for business use.  There is something
> to be said for the stability of a telco, even if it's not SBC (or AT&T now).
>  In some cases, government interference is good.  How many businesses can
> survive a loss of their phone number?  I know the ones I deal with cannot.
>
> This is something we need to take into consideration as Asterisk users or
> consultants.  We need to look at the whole picture, not just a short term
> savings.  Can your business/clients survive without listings in directory
> assistance or the phone books?  Can they survive if they have to change
> numbers due to their Voip provider losing a contract?  Some can, most can't.
>  I looked into using Voip.  Technically, it seemed like a good solution.  I
> just don't trust it in the long run.  I know that by using a telco, I will
> have access to my phone numbers.  With Voip providers, who controls the
> numbers?
>
> I think this is something a lot of people fail to take into consideration.
>
>
>
> On 4/28/06, Chris Mason (Lists) <lists at masonc.com> wrote:
> > I would be very wary, as VOIP providers feel no responsibility to the
> > customer and will not bother to tell us they might not be around next
> > week. Once bitten...
> >
> > --
> > Chris Mason
> > NetConcepts
> > (264) 497-5670 Fax: (264) 497-8463
> > Int:  (305) 704-7249 Fax: (815)301-9759 UK 44.207.183.0271
> > Cell: 264-235-5670
> > Yahoo IM: netconcepts_anguilla at yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Lacy Moore
> Aspendora, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>