[Asterisk-Users] Performance: Xeon or Opteron?

Anton Krall akrall-lists at intruder.com.mx
Tue Apr 18 17:52:21 MST 2006


That's great news! Seen sangoma is beating digium :) 

|-----Original Message-----
|From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com 
|[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of yusuf
|Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 10:57 AM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Performance: Xeon or Opteron?
|
|I have used many sangoma cards, and have not had *any* irq issues
|
|Anton Krall wrote:
|> Has anybody used the sangoma fxo cards with asterisk? Anybody using 
|> multiple cards? Problems with irq and such (same as with 
|digium ones)?
|> 
|>  
|> 
|> |-----Original Message-----
|> |From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
|> |[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John 
|> |Novack
|> |Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10:29 AM
|> |To: radamson at routers.com
|> |Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|> |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Performance: Xeon or Opteron?
|> |
|> |
|> |
|> |Rich Adamson wrote:
|> |
|> |>
|> |> While talking with one of the sangoma folks very recently, he was 
|> |> rather emphatic the pci bus was designed to "share"
|> |interrupts. I was
|> |> a little concerned as a test server had the wanpipe driver
|> |sharing an
|> |> interrupt with libata and uhc1_hcd. His comment was 
|"that's the way 
|> |> its suppose to work, sharing interrupts as needed". I've not had 
|> |> any recognizable issues with the A200D card at all, and faxing
|> |via a A200D
|> |> fxs port to a A200D fxo (pstn) port functions 100% reliably.
|> |>
|> |> What that would suggest is the TDM400 pci firmware 
|(whether on card 
|> |> logic or whatever) is the source of at least part of the
|> |TDM400 shared
|> |> interrupt issue. I don't have any digium T1/E1 cards 
|laying around, 
|> |> but if memory serves correctly, the T1/E1 cards do not 
|use the same 
|> |> pci controller chip. That would suggest the T1/E1 cards are
|> |less of an
|> |> issue then with the TDM400 card.
|> |
|> |That's good to know, but considering the response from 
|Digium on the 
|> |TDM400 ( try another motherboard) when there didn't seem to even be 
|> |an int. sharing issue, the card just couldn't be seen at all , and 
|> |the support I received from Sangoma on a recent FXS issue that was 
|> |resolved within a few days, I would tend to go with Sangoma for the 
|> |T1 card, if and when I have the need.
|> |
|> |John Novack
|> |
|> |_______________________________________________
|> |--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
|> |
|> |Asterisk-Users mailing list
|> |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|> |   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|> |
|> |
|> 
|> _______________________________________________
|> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
|> 
|> Asterisk-Users mailing list
|> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|> 
|
|
|--
|thanks,
|yusuf
|_______________________________________________
|--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
|
|Asterisk-Users mailing list
|To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list