RES: [Asterisk-Users] attended transfer issue

[dovb]

That "fix" would be great!!!

To press # and be able to get the call back and terminate the transfer...
I had to implement an horrible workaround to emulate this functionality!!!!

Dov 

-----Mensagem original-----
De: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] Em nome de John Novack
Enviada em: sábado, 15 de abril de 2006 13:19
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Assunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] attended transfer issue

Thank you for doing that.

With a little luck someone will be able to fix it, assuming they understand
it NEEDS to be fixed.

Damon Estep stated proper transfer operation well yesterday Sustitution of
another key for pound in features.conf might also be desirable

To be "typical" it would act like this;

Press pound to get secondary dial tone
Dial the number for the transfer
Either hang up or stay on the line after progress (ring) If you stay on the
line the transfer completes when you hang up If you hang up during the ring
the call is blind transferred If you press the same feature access key (#)
again you get the call back and terminate the transfer.


John Novack
Thomas Artner wrote:

>Hi!
>
>I decided to open an issue about this case in the mantis database!
>I am not very familiar with the bug/issue tracking procedure at the 
>asterisk project, but I think i can make it.
>
>Is there something that would speak against it?
>
>cheers,
>tom
>
>
>
>
>Thomas Artner wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>
>>A few months ago I needed some help for the following issue:
>>
>>.) a call comes in
>>.) Person A takes the call and does an attended transfer to Person B
>>.) Person A hangs up the phone without waiting for Person B taking the 
>>call
>>.) the caller get lost at this point !!
>>
>>At this point the attended transfer should go into a blind transfer. 
>>The phone of Person B should still be ringing and the caller shouldnt get
lost.
>>
>>I think this is the most usual behaviour of a call transfer also on 
>>the cheapest systems on the market.
>>
>>Why doesnt this work well with asterisk? Will there be a solution for 
>>that in the near future?
>>
>>I am thankful for any kind of help!
>>
>>
>>thx,
>>Tom
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>>
>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>  
>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users