[Asterisk-Users] RE: Monitor or mixmonitor

Jonathan k. Creasy jonathan at bluegrass.net
Tue Apr 4 04:37:11 MST 2006


I'd say try it out and see what the CPU load is. It's not that hard to
drop it in your dialplan and give it a try. It's much easier than
figuring out all the possible variables in your setup that might also
affect the performance. 

 

 

 

________________________________

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 10:30 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Monitor or mixmonitor

 

Hi all,

 

I am setting up a script to record all the call. There are two app for
recording. "Monitor" and "Mixmonitor", one mixing the audio on the fly
and one mixing it at the end but also allow a option not to mixing the
audio at all. If mixing the audio on the fly is not that taxing on the
CPU, I would like to use 'mixmonitor' app. My question is, what is
penalty on the CPU when mixing the audio on the fly? I know this is the
better option, but I don't really need the 'in' and 'out' audio mixed
until it's played back, and which happens less than 5% of the time. What
are your thoughts?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060404/06060d8e/attachment.htm


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list