[Asterisk-Users] Channalized T1 and PRI with Asterisk

[Michael D Schelin]

Ben, That is the correct choice for an Asterisk box. good luck.

Ben Brown wrote:

> Thanks for the replys. I'm convinced. PRI it is.
>
> Peter Svensson wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Ben Brown wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>>So the only difference with PRI is caller ID? What I am trying to 
>>>determine is if the PRI has enough advantages to give up the voice 
>>>channel used by the D channel. For what I am doing, caller ID is not 
>>>necessarily that important for my application.
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>The PRI signalling is more robust than any of the alternatives (except 
>>SS7). Call setup is faster, you can get DID, caller id and much better 
>>error reporting from the pstn.
>>
>>I would recommend against CAS or analoge connectes whenever isdn is 
>>available. 
>>
>>  
>>
>>>Can Asterisk choose the context based upon the CallerID with a PRI?
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>Yes, this can be acclomplished in the dialplan.
>>
>>Peter
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
>>
>>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>>  
>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
>
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050906/1ae59a5a/attachment.htm