[Asterisk-Users] Busy not jumping n + 101 anymore

brett at websmyths.com brett at websmyths.com
Fri Oct 14 13:51:51 MST 2005


On 10/14/2005, "Jeremy Gault" <jgault at winworld.cc> wrote:

>brett at websmyths.com wrote:
>
>>On 10/14/2005, "William M. Sandiford" <wsandiford at DURHAMTELECOM.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Ever since this upgrade, the system is jumping n+101 if it gets a busy
>>>on a Dial command, it is now proceeding to the next priority (n+1)
>>>
>>>Has something changed with this?  Is there a way to change it back?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>So glad to see you read the documentation...
>>
>>Try scanning UPGRADE.txt
>>
>>A lot has changed.
>>
>>
>We've had the same problem here ever since we upgraded to CVS-HEAD.
>When someone placed a call to a number that was busy, they would just
>receive the "call cannot be completed" recording we have setup at n+1.
>
>Not to sound nitpicky or hateful, but I just reviewed UPGRADE.txt again
>here and I don't see anything about it.  If it is in there, could you
>please point it out to me?  (Seriously, as I didn't see it.)  If it
>isn't, someone with CVS access should probably add it in.
>
>Now, I will say that I'm assuming (from the new behavior and the "show
>application dial" output) that one should now be using the ${DIALSTATUS}
>variable to handle these conditions.  (i.e. from your dial, make n+1 be a
>Goto(s-${DIALSTATUS}) command, and create s-BUSY, s-CONGESTION, etc. in
>the same context.)  Once I get around to updating our dialplans, that's
>what I plan on doing.
>
>Someone please correct me if I am wrong.  *dons asbestos armor, just in
>case*

No armor required...

I was wr-wr-wr-wrong...  It is in extentions.conf.  As mentioned by
others.

Well - I been wrong before...  8-)

Brett



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list