[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + WiFi Phones

Cory Andrews Cory at VOIPSupply.com
Wed Nov 23 15:49:11 MST 2005


Yeah the 480i-CT is a nice product, and not subject to the 
inconsistencies of WIFI.  What impressed me about the Engenius handsets 
was the range.  250,000 square feet coverage, or 3,000 acre coverage in 
an outdoor application, off a single radio AP, that's a large footprint.

Cory J Andrews
Partner / Purchasing
+++++++++++++++
VOIPSupply.com - Everything you need for VOIP
454 Sonwil Drive
Buffalo, NY 14225
+++++++++++++++
tf voice - 800-398-VOIP X22
l voice - 716.630.1555 X22
f - 716.630.1548
e - Cory at VOIPSupply.com
AIM - b2Cory



Michael Graves wrote:
> FWIW, the cordless handsets on the Aastra 480i CT work well. I've waled
> about while on a call, to a distahce of approx 300 feet before the call
> quality started to suffer. The phone supports up to 8 (I think)
> handsets, treating each as a separate extension. It can page between
> handsets without involving Asterisk. It supports up to 9 line
> appearances, which means that all the cordless and the base units can
> be on a call at one time.
>
> The only thing that I hated about the Engenius phones was the fact that
> they didn't support a plain 2.5mm connector for a headset.
>
> The 480i CT is pretty awesome.
>
> Michael
>
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:05:48 -0500, Cory Andrews wrote:
>
>   
>> I concur with Michael, the current crop of WIFI phones on the market do 
>> have their individual quirks, and you will likely encounter issues using 
>> consumer grade access points.  If you have some money to throw at this, 
>> and want a real slick, industrial grade solution that will integrate 
>> with SIP, I would recommend you check out the Durafon 1X or Durafon 4X 
>>     
> >from Engenius.  We have seen these implemented and SIP enabled using 
>   
>> your garden variety ATA or FXS gateway.  These are not WIFI phones, they 
>> use conventional Digital spread spectrum with frequency hopping, and 
>> have a very cool, full duplex 2 way radio function as well.  The 
>> handsets are bulletproof as well, very rugged and well designed.
>>
>> These were designed for relatively "extreme" environments, and they work 
>> very well, but are not inexpensive.
>>
>> Cory J Andrews
>> Partner / Purchasing
>> +++++++++++++++
>> VOIPSupply.com - Everything you need for VOIP
>> 454 Sonwil Drive
>> Buffalo, NY 14225
>> +++++++++++++++
>> tf voice - 800-398-VOIP X22
>> l voice - 716.630.1555 X22
>> f - 716.630.1548
>> e - Cory at VOIPSupply.com
>> AIM - b2Cory
>>
>>
>>
>> Michael Graves wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:33:49 -0600, David Tillman wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> This is only slightly related to Asterisk (in that we are using
>>>> Asterisk as our PBX),
>>>> so feel free to contact me off-list.
>>>>
>>>> I need to hear from someone who has practical experience using the combo of
>>>> Asterisk, WiFi, and WiFi VOIP phones like the Hitachi-Cable IPC-5000.
>>>>
>>>> In particular, I need to know if scattering consumer grade access
>>>> points (Linksys,
>>>> D-Link) throughout a warehouse is going to be satisfactory, or if we
>>>> should use some
>>>> kind of mesh access point from Orinoco or Strix. (In hopes of a better handoff.)
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> I tried using the consumer access points (Linksys WAP-54G) and had not
>>> end of troubles. Firstly, they all have to have the same SSID or not
>>> hand-off at all. Secondly, I found that the WLAN bandwidth would
>>> occasionally just go away for a few seconds, which caused calls to
>>> simply go silent for 3-4 seconds unexpectedly. Never long enough to
>>> drop the call...but enough to force me to ask the other person to
>>> repeat themselves. Lastly, the volume level presented by the WIP-5000
>>> was never enough for my tastes.
>>>
>>> I found that the range around each access point was very limited. Bear
>>> in mind that consumer access points often don't put out the full
>>> allowable RF power. If you use third party firmware hacks to up the RF
>>> output you'll find that they start to through a lot of spurious
>>> interference as well. Not the best quality radios I guess.
>>>
>>> I eventually switched to using a Astra 480i CT desk phone with a couple
>>> of corless handsets. It's been great.
>>>
>>> Michael Graves
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Graves                           mgraves at pixelpower.com
>>> Sr. Product Specialist                          www.pixelpower.com
>>> Pixel Power Inc.                                 mgraves at mstvp.com
>>>
>>> o713-861-4005
>>> o800-905-6412
>>> c713-201-1262
>>> fwd 54245
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
>>>
>>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
>>
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>>
>>     
>
> --
> Michael Graves                           mgraves at pixelpower.com
> Sr. Product Specialist                          www.pixelpower.com
> Pixel Power Inc.                                 mgraves at mstvp.com
>
> o713-861-4005
> o800-905-6412
> c713-201-1262
> fwd 54245
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>   



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list