[Asterisk-Users] fax e-mail spandsp

Craig Guy cguy at bigpond.net.au
Mon Jan 10 08:51:03 MST 2005


Yes,

And wrote it up in the wiki -
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20fax look under the
heafding 'Emailing a fax based on DID'.  I used LDAP but it could just as
easily be made to work with odbcget or whatever else you wanted to use.

Craig

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Altus Snyman" <altus at stormcorp.co.za>
To: "Howard Lowndes" <lannet at lannet.com.au>
Cc: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] fax e-mail spandsp


> Did anyone get asterisk to actually work with a fax coming in on a pri
> number and e-mail it to a user?
>
> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 08:29, Howard Lowndes wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 16:00, Altus Snyman wrote:
> > > Its still fails!
> > >
> > > root at pbx apps]# patch < apps_makefile.patch.new
> > > patching file Makefile
> > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 42 with fuzz 2 (offset -7 lines).
> > > Hunk #2 FAILED at 73.
> > > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej
> >
> > Yep, I've just had this one, and fixed it.
> >
> > cd asterisk/apps
> >
> > Go look at Makefile.rej and lines 19 & 20 (minus the leading "+" sign)
> > are the ones that didn't make it into Makefile.  If you put them in
> > manually in the correct place then it all works.
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 22:08, Jim Radford wrote:
> > > > Basically the changes in the apps/Makefile have progressed while the
patch
> > > > makefile have not. Here is a current patch that works as of
CVS-HEAD-01/06/05-14:47:06
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jim
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Altus Snyman wrote:
> > > > > I'm trying to install spandsp
> > > > > But when I try to patch the Makefile it gives this error
> > > > > [root at pbxmilkshake apps]# patch < apps_makefile.patch
> > > > > patching file Makefile
> > > > > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] y
> > > > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 41 (offset -6 lines).
> > > > > Hunk #2 FAILED at 67.
> > > > >
> > > > > is it ok to go on
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > > > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > > > >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list