[Asterisk-Users] Is there a Caller ID issue in the latest CVSStable

[Chris Wade]

Mark Eissler wrote:
> Wait a sec, so let me get this straight...
> 
> Previously if you checked out cvs 1.0.5 stable you would get the caller 
> id bug and now there's a 1.0.5 stable that doesn't have the bug? Errr, 
> someone please explain to me the versioning scheme being used here. 
> Seems to me that if stable is released with a bug then the only way to 
> change that is to issue a new release (like 1.0.6) without the bug.
> 
> -mark

Anything that comes out of CVS always incorporates recent changes.

If you check out 1.0.5 from CVS right now, you'll get 1.0.5 + the 
changes that will be part of 1.0.6.  The are two ways to get 1.0.5 as it 
was released back on XYZ date, first is to download one of the 1.0.5 
tarballs, the other is to download the CVS 1.0.5 telling CVS to pull the 
source AS OF that XYZ date.

It basically works out that CVS *is always a moving target*, tarballs 
are the only things that don't change.  Make sense?

-Chris