[Asterisk-Users] RE: Is the 2.6 Linux kernel ready for produc tion * environment

[Colin Anderson]

uname -a

Linux asterisk 2.6.10-1.1771_FC2smp # 1 SMP Mon Mar 20 01:10:51 EST i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux

Processing hundreds of calls & faxes a day. No problem. If you are going to
use a Fedora box make sure you yum update right after install then the
kernel sources symbolic link is not horribly broken as it used to be.
Otherwise, just go. 

-----Original Message-----
From: canuck15
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Sent: 8/31/2005 11:42 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Is the 2.6 Linux kernel ready for production *
environment

I was wondering what peoples thoughts are about this.  It seem that *
works just as well on Linux 2.6 as 2.4.  Maybe a few small issues here
and there but generally it seems to me that * is just as stable on
either platform.  2.4 is the obvious choice for the highest possiblility
of a stable well tested environment but 2.6 seems to have some enticing
benefits.  
 
Can Linux 2.6 be considered a viable choice now a days for someone
looking for a well tested stable production environment even though it
is not as well tested as 2.4 (yet!).  
 <<ATT00663.txt>>