[Asterisk-Users] florz patch for bristuff breaks compile on x86_64?

[Remco Barende]

I found it!!  (Heh, probably tooooo easy to mention for most of you but 
being unable to read any code at all I'm quite happy) :)

After applying florz patch it seems that the Makefile is ignoring the 
linux26 option. The Makefile should change the $KSRC to the proper 
directory i.e. /usr/src/linux-2.6 but it doesn't and keeps looking for 
/usr/src/linux. The error message is correct however.

I'm not sure who should fix this, florz or kapejod.

Anyways, the 'fix' is to change the first line of the makefile to read 
like this:
KSRC=/usr/src/linux-2.6/

Cheers! Remco



On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Remco Barende wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:57:19AM +0200, Remco Barende wrote:
>>> After upgrading a CentOS 3.x box to CentOS 4.1 (both x86_64 with an
>>> Athlon64) I also wanted to get the latest bristuff. Unfortunately
>>> bristuff without florz causes the box to kernel panic within hours
>>> (console will complain about bad frame received something).
>> 
>> Then merge the fix into the bristuff patch if it has not been merged
>> yet!
>
> That's what I did when I patched bristuff :)
>
>>> It seems however that the florz patch will not work for x86_64 arch.
>>> Bristuff -0.2.0-RC8j compiles fine without the florz patch, but after
>>> applying the patch zaphfc will not compile anymore (the patch applies
>>> cleanly).
>> 
>> Latest bristuff is RC8n, BTW. What exactly is the florz patch? It seems
>> to have been onchanged since January or so.
>
> I have never ever been able to keep a bristuffed box up for more than a few 
> hours or 2 days at best without the florz patch. It seems that KPJ is trying 
> various approaches to solve timing problems but I guess it's not stable yet.
>
> Florz fixes a lot of timing issues, reduces interrupt load and makes bristuff 
> stable.
>
> You can find more info here:
> http://zaphfc.florz.dyndns.org/
>
>
>>> Anyone managed to get bristuff with florz working on x86_64 arch?
>> 
>> It is part of the debian packages and they are built on amd64 as well.
>> 
>> http://packages.debian.org/zaptel
>> http://packages.debian.org/libpri
>> http://packages.debian.org/asterisk
>
> I would guess thet are without bristuff and/or florz?
>
> Bristuff compiles without florz, but zaphfc doesn't after applying florz.
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>