[Asterisk-Users] Using Grandstream phone , got this error in *

[John Howard]

If a routing device has an interface residing in 2 different subnets then
packets travelling though it don’t have to be natted because the connection
is routed.

It would only be natted if IP masquerading was used or snat/dnat implemented
on the traversal of the router.

jd

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Thomas
Gallaway
Sent: 28 September 2004 14:44
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Using Grandstream phone , got this error in *

david winter wrote:

> Ok i am using a grandstream on a 192.168.0.x network, connecting to * 
> on 65.105.x.x. Which might make you think i am using NAT, but im not 
> there is a cisco 3600 directly connecting these two networks. so its 
> not natting between them.

Correct me if I am wrong but everytime you translate from an private IP 
to a public IP that is considered NAT?

-- Thomas
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


This message has been scanned for viruses by MailController -
www.MailController.altohiway.com

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 24/09/2004
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 24/09/2004