[Asterisk-Users] What about a higher level configuration language

[Stefan de Konink]

Brian Capouch wrote:
> Of course, the problem of the hard-coded "priority + 101" situation is 
> problematical.  I say we think through what the perfect world would look 
> like in this respect and then see how hard it would be to implement. . .

XML will probably able to store much, probably more, of the flat text in 
a marked up as 'Asterisk XML', created with a nice XSL-template there 
would even for +101 situations not be any problems.

But my major consern is the validness of goto statements, but thats 
probably also the issue with the current 'list' versions.

It is allready possible to start developing an 'Asterisk XML' since with 
an XSLT preprocessor you are able to generate a valid extension.conf.



Stefan de Konink