[Asterisk-Users] Suggestion re: SIP/NAT/*

[Matt Riddell]

Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
> I think his point is that for a commercial rollout (say, a VSP), IAX is not
> practical for all clients right now. It's not strange to have a personal
> preference that is technically better but not commercially viable. That's
> not an insult, just how things are sometimes. Maybe if there were some ~$70
> NAT router/gateway/bridge/UPnP/etc./etc. devices that supported IAX, this'd
> change.
> 
Sorry what are you wanting the "NAT 
router/gateway/bridge/UPnP/etc./etc." devices to support about IAX 
exactly?  It does not require any mad packet mangling like SIP does.

-- 
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
_______________________________________________

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)