[Asterisk-Users] Suggestion re: SIP/NAT/*

[Michael Giagnocavo]

I think his point is that for a commercial rollout (say, a VSP), IAX is not
practical for all clients right now. It's not strange to have a personal
preference that is technically better but not commercially viable. That's
not an insult, just how things are sometimes. Maybe if there were some ~$70
NAT router/gateway/bridge/UPnP/etc./etc. devices that supported IAX, this'd
change.

-Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steven
Critchfield
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 8:02 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Suggestion re: SIP/NAT/*

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 21:53 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
> Probably since there are so many SIP devices out there now and only a
couple 
> IAX.  In the future it is an awsome replacement.

So you would rather drive a '70s pinto instead of a Bugatti because
there are more 70's fire bomb pintos?

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Matt Riddell" <matt.riddell at sineapps.com>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" 
> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Suggestion re: SIP/NAT/*
> 
> 
> > --SNIP ALL--
> > IAX is no adequate replacement option for SIP either.
> > --SNIP ALL--
> >
> > What?!  How on earth could you come to that conclusion?!

-- 
Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users