[Asterisk-Users] New T100P Pri install suggestions?

[Lyle Giese]

1) national would be my choice.

2) the number will depend on the load order of the modules when you modprobe
them.

I don't know the answers to the other two questions as I have not done a PRI
with * yet.

Lyle

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rich Adamson" <radamson at routers.com>
To: "Asterisk-a-users-list" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 7:15 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] New T100P Pri install suggestions?


> In the next week or so, we'll be turning up a new T1 Pri from Cox Cable
> in Omaha using a T100P (installed but not yet configured). While
discussing
> the interface parameters with a very knowledgable Cox engineer, we decided
> on some of the basics including b8zs, esf, dchan=24, callerid, 5 digits
> of called number forwarded to *, and switchtype=national (NI2). They
> indicated their CO switch is a DMS500 that is compatible with several
> different switchtypes including 5ess, dms100, etc. * will clock sync
> from this pri.
>
> This system also has a tdm04b (4-port fxo) installed and working, and is
> expected to remain after the t100p is implemented. Zttool can see both
cards
> at the moment.
>
> Questions:
> 1. Is a switchtype=national (NI2) a reasonable choice, or are there other
> types that others have found to be more usable/stable with * in the US?
>
> 2. Since the current system has a working tdm04b defined as fxsks=1-4 in
> /etc/zaptel.conf, how will I know when implementing the t100p whether
> those b-channels should be 5-28 or 1-23? (eg, which card has channel 1?
> It almost appears that defining the span= first with bchan=1-23 and
> follow it with fxsks=25-28 (for the tdm04b), is about the only way to
> do that without creating ambiguity for the reader.) Is that a reasonable
> approach or assumption?
>
> 3. Other then zttool, what other methods have others found useful for
> diagnosing layer 1 & 2 type issues remotely during an initial pri install?
> (After ensuring layer 1/2 functionality, I'm assuming 'pri debug', etc,
> is most appropriate for diagnosing higher layer and dialplan issues.)
>
> 4. In very general terms, when passing incoming pri calls to a specific
> extensions.conf context, is using 'exten => s,1...' a reasonable way
> to handle inbound calls initially? (Is the 'called number' passed in
> EXTEN like it is with sip calls?)
>
> Any other tips/tricks for handling an initial pri installation?
>
> Rich
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>