[Asterisk-Users] Re: Top posting - are we there yet?

[Jon Lawrence]

On Tuesday 16 November 2004 17:12, Jay Milk wrote:
> I'm a fairly reasonable person, and I have yet to see one good argument
> (and quoting netiquette is not on argument, that's opinion) for
> bottom-posting.  To me, it is terribly inefficient and wastes time,
> especially when you hide your post between the original message and some
> ludicrously elaborate signature.  Top-posting, to me, is more logical,
> as it presents the answer in a prominent position.  And inline-posting
> makes sense when you're responding to multiple questions or points in an
> email...
>

Whether you top post or not is irrelevant really.
Top posting - you have to scroll around to find out what question they are 
answering.
bottom posting - you have to scroll to find the answer.

I'll reply to both top and bottom postings - if I think I've got anything to 
add.

What's more annoying is people who just click reply instead of starting a new 
tread.

Jon