[Asterisk-Users] STUN and Asterisk? (Was: SER is a better NAT solution?)

Matthew Boehm mboehm at cytelcom.com
Tue Nov 23 08:51:59 MST 2004


STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right? And
both interfaces need seperate public IP's right? 'And' the phones/ATA's need
to support STUN right? I don't think the Cisco phones support STUN.

-Matthew
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Wilkins" <brian at hcc.net>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution?
Addendum:LinksysWRT54G


> If you had 100,000 phones registering to the Asterisk server, I would
think
> you would have at least two or three more Asterisk servers for people to
> point to their devices to. Who is to say that SER won't crash with 100,000
> registrations either? You could always use a STUN server on each Asterisk
box
> and that will work perfectly.
>
>
> On Tuesday 23 November 2004 03:13 pm, Matthew Boehm wrote:
> > Yes, exactly! I think 100,000 phones all regeristing every 60 seconds
would
> > put quite a load. And if 50% of them are all behind NAT/FW, asterisk
> > wouldn't play nice, would it?
> >
> > So, is SER a better option for this?
> >
> > -Matthew
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matt Riddell" <matt.riddell at sineapps.com>
> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution? Addendum:
> > LinksysWRT54G
> >
> > > Tracy R Reed wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:00:48AM -0500, Paul Rodan spake thusly:
> > > >>I am quite interested in this as well. I didn't realize
registrations
> >
> > are
> >
> > > >>the #1 cause of load on an asterisk server, we haven't gotten to
that
> >
> > kind
> >
> > > >>of usage just yet.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think they are, are they? How could a few registration
packets
> > > > per phone once an hour come anywhere near the load of a single sip
> >
> > session?
> >
> > > I guess if you have 100,000 customers.  Say 5-10% are making calls and
> > > yet all of them register?
> > >
> > > Maybe.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Matt Riddell
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > > http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
> > > http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> -- 
> Brian Wilkins
> Software Engineer
> brian at hcc.net
>
> Heritage Communications Corporation
>   Melbourne, FL     USA     32935
> 321.308.4000 x33
> http://www.hcc.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list