[Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution? Addendum: LinksysWRT54G

[Matthew Boehm]

Yes, exactly! I think 100,000 phones all regeristing every 60 seconds would
put quite a load. And if 50% of them are all behind NAT/FW, asterisk
wouldn't play nice, would it?

So, is SER a better option for this?

-Matthew


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matt Riddell" <matt.riddell at sineapps.com>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution? Addendum:
LinksysWRT54G


> Tracy R Reed wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:00:48AM -0500, Paul Rodan spake thusly:
> >
> >>I am quite interested in this as well. I didn't realize registrations
are
> >>the #1 cause of load on an asterisk server, we haven't gotten to that
kind
> >>of usage just yet.
> >
> >
> > I don't think they are, are they? How could a few registration packets
> > per phone once an hour come anywhere near the load of a single sip
session?
>
> I guess if you have 100,000 customers.  Say 5-10% are making calls and
> yet all of them register?
>
> Maybe.
>
> -- 
> Cheers,
>
> Matt Riddell
> _______________________________________________
>
> http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
> http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users