[Asterisk-Users] Re: loss concealment (Steve Kann)

[Steve Kann]

Public Dump wrote:

>Thank you for the URL. 
>To clarify the information from the page, IF I would use iLBC I would
>enjoy loss concealment ?
>  
>

When/If this proposed jitterbuffer is implemented, then if you would be 
able to enjoy PLC (Packet loss concealment) with your choice of several 
codecs, including at least G711, PCM, Speex and iLBC.  The first two 
with a simple concealment algorithm (I think one is described in an 
RFC), and the latter via their built-in interpolation algorithms.

-SteveK

>Message: 1
>Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:30:41 -0500
>From: Steve Kann <stevek at stevek.com>
>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] loss concealment
>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>	<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
>Message-ID: <418656A1.8020602 at stevek.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Public Dump wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Is asterisk capable of sealing (some amount) of losses that occur on 
>>IP based channels before it routes the Calls to a TDM channel (BRI, 
>>E1, etc.) to limit quality loss if IP loss occurs ?
>>    
>>
>
>No, not yet.
>
>See
>http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20new%20jitterbuff
>er
>
>-SteveK
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041102/0af817fc/attachment.htm