[Asterisk-Users] snom200 -> asterisk & dtmf (rfc2833)
steve szmidt
steve at szmidt.org
Tue Nov 2 10:12:03 MST 2004
On Monday 01 November 2004 05:20 am, Arsen Chaloyan wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Seems, snom200 with 3.x software versions isn't
> compliant to rfc2833, while no such problem with
> 2.04.g.
> Timestamp and event duration are increased
> simultaneously, while timestamp should points to the
> beginning of the event and event duration extends
> forwards from that time.
>
> In any case, asterisk is able to detect dtmfs
> correctly. But I believe that in scenarios where
> asterisk acts as IP->PSTN gateway the dtmf sequence
> generated by asterisk in PSTN side can be incorrect.
> In other words dtmfs can be overlapped if they quickly
> pressed on snom.
>
> Unfortunately, I have no PSTN card installed on my
> asterisk.
> Can somebody check if this works?
>
> snom200(2.04.g vs 3.x) --ip--> asterisk --pstn-->
> phone
Hmm, I don't see that as even being an issue as snom only sends the digits
once you press OK (except when asterisk is configured to read it "live").
If you mean dtmf after a connection is established, then that's true for any
equipment. I.e. a too brief signal is always possible. I'd call that user
error. Using my snom I can't say I've noticed anything like the above during
normal use.
Now there is another problem in that sometimes I don't get it to dial out. I
get a period of silence after hitting OK. A while later I get a dialtone. Or
I end up with a fast busy.
But I _think_ that is related to the non-digium hw I'm testing for pstn
access. If I press redial a number of times I'll get through. My thought is
that if it was a snom error then redial would never work, as it's only
repeating what I typed. And, it behaves the same way if I manually redial a
number of times.
My firmware is V3.52.
--
Steve Szmidt
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list