[Asterisk-Users] Downgrading Asterisk

[Rich Adamson]

> > Although many of us that have worked in a production I/T arena assume
> > something called Stable would truly have known bugs fixed, that's hardly the
> > case for *. That branch really should be renamed to something like v1.0 and
> > remove any reference to Stable and bug fixes as its treated as a lockdown
> > for added functionality, and has nothing to do with functional stability.
> 
> This comment shows you suffer from not understanding that words have
> more than one meaning. Stable means not changing much. A stable table
> doesn't fall over and not that it doesn't have flaws in the design such
> as being only 1 foot off of the ground. 
> 
> Similar people have the same mistaken opinion about Debian, it is stable
> because it doesn't change much. Only things that must change(security)
> gets changed in stable. Someone who runs stable shouldn't have to worry
> too much about things changing. 
> 
> Remember the reason for stable, it is there to make a run at a 1.0 code
> release. What software do you know of besides "Hello World" has a bug
> free 1.0 release.

Critch,

That's not even close to reasonable comments, and even Mark has made 
comments that contradict yours above. Stable might not roll over, but 
that's about all that can be said about it.

We'll take it up off list if you really want to discuss it.

Rich