[Asterisk-Users] AArgh, * and the 7960

[brian k. west]

Also on a side note if Kapejod isn't wanting keep chan_capi up to date then
someone needs to ask him if he will disclaim it so digium can include it and
help maintain it.

bkw

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "brian k. west" <brian at bkw.org>
To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AArgh, * and the 7960


> > I'd love to fix the problem, but no-one is listening!
> >
> > I did what you said, captured Ethereal traces, found that timestamps do
> > not increment, found BLATANT errors in rtp.c where a signed int is being
> > used to hold return values from an unsigned int function...  and had my
> > bug report thrown out because I am only able to reproduce the problem
with
> > chan_capi.
>
> The problem isn't with asterisk chan_capi will have to be updated to deal
> with the changes.
>
> > Now I know that chan_capi doesn't belong to Digium, and I know that
you're
> > all trying to get a 1.0 release out.  But this problem is really hurting
> > my business, and right now destroying any chance that I might start
> > offering Asterisk as part of commercial solutions.
>
> I don't see these issues in any other channel driver.
>
> > Now, kapejod is not replying to my e-mails, and markster's suggestion
> > (from another bug report) of zeroing out the delivery field in
chan_capi's
> > read function did not work.  So hacking is all I have left if I want to
> > keep using Asterisk -- which I do, because I think it's a great program
> > with a pretty good community around it.
>
> Where are you ethereal traces so I can look over them.
>
> bkw
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>