[Asterisk-Users] Most common CODEC
Michael Shuler
mike at bwsys.net
Mon Mar 8 22:19:42 MST 2004
I agree but I have never seen it actually implemented in anything other than
a softphone. If you know of any "hard" phone out there that supports it
please let me know.
----------------------------------------
Michael Shuler, C.E.O.
BitWise Systems, Inc.
1301 W. Pioneer Parkway
Peoria, IL 61615
Office: (217) 585-0357
Cell: (309) 657-6365
Fax: (309) 213-3500
E-Mail: mike at bwsys.net
Customer Service: (877) 976-0711
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Kohlsmith
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 10:46 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Most common CODEC
>
>
> > G.729 is the best codec IMHO. Goto
> > http://www.packetizer.com/iptel/bandcalc.html to get the real scoop.
>
> IMO ILBC beats G.729 in terms of quality, especially in
> environments where
> packet loss can occur. It's about the same
> computationally-speaking but
> it's also royalty-free.
>
> GSM is my second choice but it eats quite a bit more bandwidth in
> comparsion.
>
> That packetizer link has no comparisons with any OSS codecs, which is
> unfortunate because it seems to pass itself off as an
> authoritative source
> on bandwidth use in IP telephony.
>
> Regards,
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list