[Asterisk-Users] Slackware 10.0 and asterisk and 2.4 vs 2.6
Zdenek Bouresh
zdenek at unixsol.org
Thu Jul 8 14:32:45 MST 2004
mattf wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am running Asterisk on Slackware 10.0 with the 2.4 kernel(default kernel)
>and it is very happy. Don't see too much difference from 9.1 except for the
>fact that most of the binutils have been updated and several of them run
>differently now(top, ps, ...)
>
>Haven't tried the 2.6 kernel yet, but may try it later.
>
>MATT---
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joe Baptista [mailto:baptista at dot-god.com]
>Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:01 AM
>To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
>Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Slackware 10.0 and asterisk and 2.4 vs 2.6
>
>
>
>I'm installing the new Slackware 10.0 distribution - but not sure if i
>should go with the 2.4 kernal - which i think is the default install - or
>the new 2.6 kernal? anyone running * and slackware 10.0 with 2.6 kernal?
>
>thanks
>joe
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
Slackware 10 and kernel 2.6.6 and 2.6.7 run fine .
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list