[Asterisk-Users] ADSI phone vs. IP phone
Ulexus
ulexus at lifelabs.net
Sun Jan 18 00:32:02 MST 2004
On Sunday, 18 January, 2004 02:04, Ken Alker wrote:
> Assuming the price of an ADSI screen phone (say, Aastra 390) was the same
> as an IP screen phone (say, Cisco 7960) and someone was setting up an *
> server for their 20 employees (each of whom would have either an ADSI or IP
> phone on their desk), would there be advantages to using the ADSI phones
> over the IP phones, or vice-versa? For discussion, let's assume that the
> hardware needed to patch the ADSI phones back into * was not a cost
> concern. I'm looking for differences between the technologies independent
> of cost.
>
Pretty much no. The ADSI specification was crippled from the start to
specificly not compete with PBX offerings. It has one advantage of (very
limited) programmability, but a phone like the SNOM has an open-source core.
It also has the dubious value of being interchangeable with a regular analog
phone, but that is about it.
You will not get anything near the functionality and feature set of a SIP
phone, and it has the further irritation that much of its signalling is both
in-band and audible.
It is too bad. If it were properly implemented, the concept behind ADSI is
great. Unfortunately, Telcordia strikes again.
--
Sean C. McCord
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list