[Asterisk-Users] Hardware to build an Enterprise AsteriskUniversal Gateway

Rich Adamson radamson at routers.com
Sun Jan 4 11:51:17 MST 2004


> Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> >>I would set the "Enterprise Class" bar at five 9's reliability
> >>(about 5.25 minutes per year of down time) the same
> >>as a Class 4/5 phone switch. This would require redundant
> >>design considerations in both hardware and software.
> > 
> 
> To turn around, let's discuss what we need to focus on to get
> Asterisk there:
> 
> Here's a few bullet points, there's certainly a lot more
> * Linux platform stability - how?
> ** Special demands when using Zaptel cards
> * Redundancy architecture
> * Development/stable release scheme
> 
> Then we have some channel demands, like
> * Better support for SRV records in the SIP channel
> 
> More?

Better sip phone support for primary/secondary proxy (and failover)
 (note: some phones don't support a second proxy at all; some say they
  do, but fail at it.)

Maybe some sort of HSRP (hot spare standby protocol, or whatever)

Some form of dynamic config sharing between pri/sec systems

Won't mention external pstn line failover as that's sort of a separate
  topic, or loss of calls in flight, etc.

I'd guess part of the five-9's discussion centers around how automated
must one be to be able to actually get close?  If one assumes the loss
of a SIMM the answer/effort certainly is different then assuming the 
loss of a single interface card (when multiples exist), etc.

I would doubt that anyone reading this list actually have a justifiable
business requirement for five-9's given the expontential cost/effort
involved to get there. But, setting some sort of reasonable goal
that would focus towards failover within xx number of seconds (and
maybe some other conditions) seems very practical. 






More information about the asterisk-users mailing list