[Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance

[Matt Schulte]

Er, I wasn't the one who owns the quad xeon. Just a curious person. :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: mattf [mailto:mattf at vicimarketing.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 8:43 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance


There is nothing wrong with running Asterisk on SMP. It runs quite well
actually.

I'm assuming you just have the Quad Xeon 450mhz sitting around because
you can't buy them new anymore, so it probably isn't costing you
anything to use it. In which case it isn't a waste. If you are paying
more than $800 for it, save it and just buy a new P4 for less. A $200
machine may not be able to handle 25 concurrent conversations, and may
have some used or sub-standard parts in it, so that may not be the best
choice.

You should be able to have upto 25 channels running on this machine no
problem, How many maximum conversations do you forsee running
concurrently at one time on this system?

MATT---

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schulte [mailto:mschulte at netlogic.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance


Meaning Asterisk won't/can't take advantage of the four CPU's? Or it's
overkill for this scenario?

-----Original Message-----
From: joachim [mailto:zoachien at securax.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 12:52 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance



Send me the quad and i'll send you a 200$ pc to do this job.

The quad is heavily overpowered.

Joachim.

At 22:00 24/08/2004, you wrote:
>content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C48A15.130BF232"
>
>We're looking at implementing Asterisk in our department in the near 
>future, we're looking at anywhere from 15-25 extensions. The machine we

>were looking at running this on was a Quad Xeon 450mhz (2MB L2 Cache)
w/ 
>1GB of ram. I've heard bad things about running Asterisk on SMP
machines? 
>Would we be running into any performance issues with this machine?
>
>Tim Jackson
>Network Engineer
>Angelina County, Texas
>(936)639-4827 office
>(936)414-6723 mobile
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users