[Asterisk-Users] Help with GPL license of Asterisk
Troy Settle
troy at psknet.com
Mon Sep 29 08:22:05 MST 2003
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Spencer
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:41 AM
>
> > 1) if your application is not released to a 3rd party, you
> do not have
> > to make the source available
>
> This is TRUE.
>
> > 2) if you build your application as a module that loads into a stock
> > asterisk server, you do not have to disclose your source
>
> This is FALSE. Even modules for Asterisk MUST be released under GPL,
> unless you obtain a license to release them outside of GPL
> from Digium.
Interesting. The GPL is more parasitic than I had originally thought.
>
> > 3) if you need to make changes to the core in order for
> your application
> > to work, you'll need to disclose source for your changes to
> the core,
> > but not for your application. This sounds horrid, but it's
> not too bad,
> > as your simply augmenting the core API and keeping your
> goodies in the
> > binary only portion of the release.
>
> This is also FALSE. You MUST release both the module AND core changes
> unless you obtain license from Digium. I believe you are
> confusing the
> "Linus exception" which is an exception for the Linux kernel
> explicitly
> made by Linus Torvalds, allowing binary only modules to the
> kernel only.
>
I was unaware of the 'Linux Exception,' as I'm not a developer, but I
was thinking about how some companies do release binary only modules for
the Linux kernel, and wrongly assumed that this was provided for in the
GPL.
All I can say, is sorry if I mislead anyone, and thank God I'm not a
software developer and don't have to deal with this evil, evil license.
--
Troy Settle
Pulaski Networks
http://www.psknet.com
540.994.4254 ~ 866.477.5638
Pulaski Chamber 2002 Small Business Of The Year
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list