[Asterisk-Users] E1 problems

[Martin Pycko]

Yeah, I thought you were talking about PRI on E1 :)

Martin

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Steve Underwood wrote:

> I think you have something backwards. PRI on E1 is great - 100% standard
> throughout the world, apart from some very old leftovers. Its the CAS
> stuff which needs endless new state machines. They really do need state
> machines. Write them in C, or do as we did (draw them graphically in
> Autocad, and compile them directly down to ROM tables). Either way you
> build a state machine.
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
>
> Martin Pycko wrote:
>
> >Maybe if they'd write the PRI stack in C instead of making a state machine
> >they woun'd need to make adjustments so often.
> >
> >regards
> >Martin
> >
> >On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Steve Underwood wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Do people actually do the *ANI*DNIS* thing on E1s? I've never seen that.
> >>E1s are a real pain for anything but PRI or SS7. There is so little
> >>standardisation. A place I used to work has a substantial team turning
> >>out new signalling protocol state machines for each customer of its E1
> >>muxes.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Steve
> >>
> >>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>