[Asterisk-Users] E1 problems

Steve Underwood steveu at coppice.org
Wed Sep 3 08:55:57 MST 2003


I think you have something backwards. PRI on E1 is great - 100% standard 
throughout the world, apart from some very old leftovers. Its the CAS 
stuff which needs endless new state machines. They really do need state 
machines. Write them in C, or do as we did (draw them graphically in 
Autocad, and compile them directly down to ROM tables). Either way you 
build a state machine.

Regards,
Steve


Martin Pycko wrote:

>Maybe if they'd write the PRI stack in C instead of making a state machine
>they woun'd need to make adjustments so often.
>
>regards
>Martin
>
>On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Steve Underwood wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Do people actually do the *ANI*DNIS* thing on E1s? I've never seen that.
>>E1s are a real pain for anything but PRI or SS7. There is so little
>>standardisation. A place I used to work has a substantial team turning
>>out new signalling protocol state machines for each customer of its E1
>>muxes.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Steve
>>    
>>





More information about the asterisk-users mailing list