[Asterisk-Users] Chan_h323/g729 - X100P connecting to non-Digium Partner

[mawali at news.icns.com]

Hi
The endpoint seems to be running Radvision h323 stack, and I know 
chan_h323 works with Radvision, there could be a couple of reasons!!

1) You dont have G729A in the capabilities of remote endpoint
2) The packetization interval is way off

The best way would be to run ethereal or dump323 and see what is being 
negotiated. Also try to use fastConnect on both sides and force same 
packetization, (you can use my patch posted a couple of days ago to force 
packetization interval in G729 in chan_h323)

Isamar Said 

>I have on Chan_h323 with G729 and X100P trying to connect to
>a Planet VOIP400 gateway box(http://www.planet.com.tw)
>
>I uncommented g729 in the Makefile and I'm setting g729 in h323.conf
>I'm receving in my side:
>
>1:20.906          H225 Caller:810f070       h323ep.cxx(1537)
>H323 Clearing connection ip$localhost/4112 reason=EndedByRemoteUser
>
>
>and the other side(Planet) says:
>
>  15- RADH 2 HSMU RAD: cmHookSend(masterSlaveDeterminationAck)
>  11- HSMU 0 Remote capabilities list:
>   0- HSMU 0      [1] g729AnnexA: Audio Receive
>   0- HSMU 0 Try matching local element:
>   0- HSMU 0      [1] g7231: Audio Receive and Transmit
>   0- HSMU 0 Try matching local element:
>   0- HSMU 0      [2] g729: Audio Receive and Transmit
>   0- HSMU 0 Try matching local element:
>   0- HSMU 0      [3] g711Ulaw64k: Audio Receive and Transmit
>   0- HSMU 0 Try matching local element:
>   0- HSMU 0      [4] t38fax: Data Receive and Transmit
>   0- HSMU 0 Try matching local element:
>   0- HSMU 0      [5] g729: Audio Receive and Transmit
>   0- HSMU 3 HSMU 2: Capabilities: NO MATCH FOUND!
>   0- HSSM 2 HSMU 2: SM "H245 WAIT COMPLETE" <- "error release"
>   1- HSMU 2 HSMU 2: abort timer in state H245 WAIT COMPLETE
>   0- HSSM 2 HSMU 2: SM "H245 WAIT COMPLETE" ==> "RELEASING"
>  10- RADH 2 HSMU RAD: cmHookSend(endSessionCommand)
>   3- RAD 2 HSMU 2: 
>cmEvCallControlStateChanged(cmControlStateTransportDisconnected, - )
>
>Anybody has any idea?