[Asterisk-Users] PRI Question

Martin Pycko martinp at digium.com
Mon Aug 18 18:08:30 MST 2003


First of all you should have callprogress=no and immediate=no for any kind
of a PRI. Also why is your d-channel going down ? Can you send a trace
"pri intense debug span 1" ?

regards
Martin

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Barry Porch wrote:

>
>
> I managed to get Asterisk working with my PBX using T1, now I am moving
> on to trying to make PRI work.
>
> I have my zaptel.conf and zapata.conf configured as follows:
>
> Zaptel.conf:
>
> span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs
> bchan=1-23
> dchan=24
> loadzone=us
> defaultzone=us
>
> Zapata.conf:
>
> [channels]
> transfer=yes
> immediate=yes
> callprogress=yes
>
> language=en
> context=default
> switchtype=national
> signalling=pri_net
> group=1
> channel=1-23
>
> I have a PRI port provisioned off my PBX to work with the above
> settings.  When I start up Asterisk everything seems to come up (my PBX
> "sees" a D-channel) but I get constant output as follows:
>
> == D-Channel on span 1 up
>
> B-channel 2 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 3 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 4 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 5 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 6 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 7 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 8 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 9 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 10 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 11 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 12 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 13 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 14 restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 16 restarted on span 1
>
> D-Channel on span 1 down
>
> D-Channel on span 1 up
>
> B-channel 2 successfully restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 3 successfully restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 4 successfully restarted on span 1
>
> B-channel 5 successfully restarted on span 1
>
> .... And so forth with the D-channel going up and down and various
> channels "successfully restarting" but inbound calls do not work.
>
> I have tried changing the PRI protocol, I have swapped the CPE and NET
> settings between the PBX and Asterisk and every combination gives me
> this same result.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks!
>




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list