[Asterisk-Users] Does Wildcard x100p support BT Caller ID in UK?

[Andy Powell]

Hi Mark,

Short of taking my board out of my * box is there any way to check what revision of the TDM400P I have? It was purchased in May of this year. Is the pricing likely to be the same or similar to the add-on FXS ports? Does this also mean that as we'd be able to get away with not using the x100p we could add another TDM400P card taking the maximum up to 3, ie 12 ports?

Below is what is dumped from lspci -vv on my system, hopefully it would help identify the board I have....

many thanks

Andy



01:09.0 Network controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Model 300 128k
        Subsystem: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Model 300 128k
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
        Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
        Latency: 64 (250ns min, 32000ns max)
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 7
        Region 0: I/O ports at ec00 [size=256]
        Region 1: Memory at fdfff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2+ AuxCurrent=55mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-

01:0b.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Model 300 128k
        Subsystem: Unknown device 8085:0003
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
        Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
        Latency: 64 (250ns min, 32000ns max)
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 9
        Region 0: I/O ports at e800 [size=256]
        Region 1: Memory at fdffe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2+ AuxCurrent=55mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 11/08/2003 at 08:53 Mark Spencer wrote:

>> I just hope that the price difference is small enough for Digium to
>> consider this other chipset. From the lists it is obvious that there is
>> a lot of interest for their hardware outside the US/Japan market. Same
>> goes for the rumoured 4port fxo cards, of course.
>
>The FXO modules we've designed for the TDM400P's are definitely designed
>for worldwide operation and should be able to detect polarity reversal.
>Also there will be an option for hardware echo cancelation.  The first rev
>of the FXO module is in layout now so hopefully we'll have some prototypes
>in the next few weeks.
>
>Clearly, the TDM400P is aspiring to be the logical platform for FXS/FXO in
>low density.  We've done some very substantial improvements on the TDM400P
>to obtain extremely low noise on the "Rev E" boards, and to eliminate
>other problems people were reporting (e.g. bus master aborts, etc).
>
>Mark
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users