[asterisk-dev] Video calling

[Troy Bowman]

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:56 PM John Kiniston <johnkiniston at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I do not recommend using chan_sip, chan_sip is no longer receiving
> development.
> chan_pjsip is where the development focus is at.
>

Sure, chan_pjsip is where the feature development focus is, but is it truly
stable enough for production now?  It seems I still see a lot of bug
fixes for seemingly constant problems, while chan_sip's code is so mature
that it just works hands-off.  I'm still afraid of using chan_pjsip in
production just like I am still afraid of Linux's btrfs in production, and
btrfs has been in development for over a decade.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20191115/7a2900f4/attachment-0001.html>