[asterisk-dev] Opinions Needed: PJSIP Outboud Registration with multiple server_uris

[George Joseph]

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Brad Watkins <marquis42 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm just throwing this out there, but what if the "pattern" (we'll use
> that name for now, although I'm not sure I like it as the final name) could
> itself define new types.  Then, if you provided a standard config (i.e.,
> the sample config) which defined some set of standard types (phone,
> itsp/trunk, whatever) you could have configurations with semantics similar
> to what Josh originally proposed.  It also means a user of Asterisk can
> look at the config for the pattern and both see what it's doing under the
> hood (vs. being in the code somewhere) and also modify it for their own
> needs if they'd like to.
>
> Anyway, just a thought.
>
> Makes sense to me.


>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140921/f9e1f37a/attachment.html>