[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4066: stasis_channels.c: Resolve unfinished Dials when doing masquerades (Part 2)

Matt Jordan reviewboard at asterisk.org
Mon Oct 13 13:04:01 CDT 2014


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4066/#review13502
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Matt Jordan


On Oct. 9, 2014, 12:22 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4066/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 9, 2014, 12:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-24237 and ASTERISK-24394
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24237
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24394
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Masquerades into and out of channels that are involved in a dial operation don't create the expected dial end event.  The missing dial end event goes against the model for things like CDRs and generating Dial end manager actions and such.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/12/main/stasis_channels.c 424943 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4066/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> There are four cases:
> 1) A channel masquerades into the caller channel.  The case happens when performing a blonde transfer using the channel driver's protocol.
> 2) A channel masquerades into a callee channel.  The case happens when performing a directed call pickup.
> 3) The caller channel masquerades out of dial.  The case happens when using the Bridge application on the caller channel.
> 4) A callee channel masquerades out of dial.  The case happens when using the Bridge application on a peer channel.
> 
> The four cases are now handled as expected from the dial events perspective by this patch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> rmudgett
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20141013/bf3a6b46/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list