[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3593: astobj2: Additional refactoring to push impl specific code down into the impls.
George Joseph
reviewboard at asterisk.org
Fri Jun 6 14:49:19 CDT 2014
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3593/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated June 6, 2014, 1:49 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers and rmudgett.
Changes
-------
Addressed Richard's comments concerning sort_fn being a prereq for a container integrity check.
However... Removing the sort_fn check is highlighting issues, mostly in main/format, that are causing lots of integrity check failed error messages to be printed to the console. The issues are pre-existing and all test framework tests pass, it's just that there are now errors being printed for them.
Repository: Asterisk
Description
-------
Move some implementation specific code from astobj2_container.c into astobj2_hash.c and astobj2_rbtree.c. This completely removes the need for astobj2_container to switch on RTTI and it no longer has any knowledge of the implementation details. The RTTI itself is no longer needed but I don't want to remove it until weak reference containers are added in case I need it back again. If not, I'll remove it then.
Diffs (updated)
-----
branches/12/main/astobj2_rbtree.c 415336
branches/12/main/astobj2_hash.c 415336
branches/12/main/astobj2_container_private.h 415336
branches/12/main/astobj2_container.c 415336
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3593/diff/
Testing
-------
Ran all the test framework tests plus the "astobj2 test" test.
Ran testsuite tests/channels/pjsip.
Thanks,
George Joseph
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20140606/80a43535/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list