[asterisk-dev] more granular control of TImer T1

[Matthew Jordan]

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Damon Estep <damon at soho-systems.com> wrote:

> “T1min was used as the lowest possible value of T1 for a monitored host -
> with qualify=yes. If that's changed, we need to re-review that.”
>
>
>
> Yes, it has changed (if it ever really was that way) you cannot configure
> a value lower than T1min for an unmonitored host, if you do a warning is
> logged and the t1min value is used instead. There appear to be 3 or 4
> checks in the code for this. There is also a check for values below 200,
> which is completely arbitrary.
>
>
>
I'm fine if t1min is not used as a lower bounds for the T1 timer for
unmonitored hosts.

That being said, I'd prefer there to be *some* lower bound provided. A user
accidentally enters an extremely low value (such as 0 or 1) - and who gets
no WARNING or lower bound correction - will experience some interesting
behavioral problems that could be difficult to diagnose.

Matt

-- 
Matthew Jordan
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20131113/e1415762/attachment.html>