[asterisk-dev] Time to rename chan_gulp?

[jg]

Compared with Mitsubishi's "Pajero" disaster 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_Pajero), "gulp" seems to be 
harmless.

Nevertheless, why not use a conservative approach and keep chan_sip and 
introduce a naming scheme for deprecated and obsolete channels, that 
could be used for overhauled channels in the future as well? After all, 
if for some reason the old tech cannot be abandoned, a variable can be 
used to dispatch the real name to centralize the channel selection.

jg