[asterisk-dev] Time to rename chan_gulp?

[Joshua Colp]

Paul Belanger wrote:
> Why not just call it chan_sip-new? Seriously, adding a 1,2, or 9999
> after something is just wrong.
>
> Name the module as chan_gulp, but the dial tech as SIP. I don't believe
> it is possible to run both chan_sip and chan_gulp at the same time is it?

As it is right now if you bind to different ports you most certainly 
can. I do that on my dev box.

-- 
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at:  www.digium.com  & www.asterisk.org