[asterisk-dev] Time to rename chan_gulp?

[Olle E. Johansson]

3 maj 2013 kl. 21:10 skrev Tilghman Lesher <tilghman at meg.abyt.es>:

> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Andrew Latham <lathama at gmail.com> wrote:
>> My personal feelings are to use chan_sip name for the work in
>> chan_gulp and mark the origional sip work with a chan_sip1 or
>> chan_oldsip.
>> 
>> I don't expect a lot of agreement but its how things are done in some circles.
> 
> We tend not to do things in this camp that have a tendency to severely
> *break* anybody doing a single major version upgrade.  For that reason
> alone, I think such a proposal is a non-starter.  It might otherwise
> be possible for the "SIP" prefix to float between modules, such that
> for the next version, "SIP" is defaulted towards the old driver, with
> the old driver also possessing a name like "SIP1", thus allowing
> admins to transition the name at their own pace, or even keep the old
> name solidly on the old driver ad infinitum.

I don't like renaming and breaking.

On the other hand I have a branch where I configure the dial string in chan_sip,
since in that branch I load chan_sip multiple times with different prefixes.
So we can have the dial string configurable, with a default for "SIP" for the old one.

/O