[asterisk-dev] iLBC, 30ms

[Jared Smith]

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Malcolm Davenport <malcolmd at digium.com>wrote:

> The patch on that issue does a wholesale replacement of 30ms iLBC with
> 20ms.  Such a change in a release branch, or even trunk, seems
> scary/bad/perilous - especially noting compatibility with previous versions
> .  But, if no one uses 30ms iLBC, perhaps it doesn't matter, and perhaps a
> horde of people will be able to more effectively use iLBC.
>
> What say you?
>

To me, this sounds like a hack -- forcing a codec to a particular (and
non-default) packet duration.  Why not figure out what's going wrong with
the transcoding, instead of just band-aiding it?

--
Jared Smith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20130717/9ef9234b/attachment.htm>