[asterisk-dev] Answering SDP video 0 to video 0 Offer (or why Lync cannot get user off on-hold)

[Matthew Jordan]

On 10/15/2012 08:41 AM, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> On 10/15/2012 05:35 AM, Walter Doekes wrote:

> It should be nearly trivial to backport the initial patch to 10 and
> shouldn't be too bad for 1.8 either.  The reason it has not been done
> already is that is a significant change in behavior and is somewhat
> invasive.
> 

I don't think we should backport the entire patch to 1.8/10.  The fact
that it broke the SDP_offer_answer test in the Test Suite was because it
changed the behaviour of Asterisk with how it considered what was an
acceptable SDP offer.  While I think the behavioural change was the
correct thing to do, it could be rather jarring in a release branch.

I'm fine if this aspect of that patch is backported - but we'd want to
be careful not to introduce a major behavioural change in 1.8/10.

-- 
Matthew Jordan
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org