[asterisk-dev] Named ACLs

[Olle E. Johansson]

13 jun 2012 kl. 17:28 skrev Kevin P. Fleming:

> On 06/13/2012 09:46 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> 
>> In response to the review:
>> 
>> I think you've totally missed why John Todd and I came up with the ideas around Named ACLs. They have to be MANAGEABLE. That's why you will find a lot of work with trying to find out a way to manage NACLs in AMI and the CLI in my code. I would suggest that you take a look at this part too.
> 
> And I think you've missed a very important point: the code that has been posted so far is a *framework*, clearly marked as not yet finished, that was put up for review in order to ensure that the framework was sound and was headed in the right direction to support what was desired. It is not done, not even close to done, and no statement to that effect has been made.
So should I take it that you don't want feedback on framework reviews? You make me confused. I say that I think that the code in this review has totally missed the point of the whole project as outlined at one point by John and myself. You say I missed the point - which point? Don't you want' feedback?

> 
> As it turns out, now that we've had the opportunity to spend more time thinking about how the end result needs to work, we've tasked Johnathan with stepping back and documenting the desired use cases and proposed design on a wiki page so we can ensure that the project is headed in the right direction. This should have been done originally, but was not, and for that we'll take the blame.

I am still confused on why Jonathan was not tasked with getting back to me and John to figure out why we did this in the first place and what state the code is in. But I guess I'm missing your point again and apologize for that.

Sorry for disturbing the conversation.
/O