[asterisk-dev] Asterisk 11 configuration files

[Olle E. Johansson]

27 aug 2012 kl. 17:09 skrev Leif Madsen <leif.madsen at asteriskdocs.org>:

> On 23/08/12 10:35 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
>> I'm slowly starting to testing Asterisk 11 and noticed something about
>> our new modules config file names:
>> 
>> chan_motif.so -> motif.conf
>> 
>> and
>> 
>> res_corosync.so -> res_corosync.conf
>> res_xmpp.so -> xmpp.conf
>> 
>> When chan_dahdi was rewritten we moved to chan_dahdi.conf. Should we do
>> the same for chan_motif -> chan_motif.conf?
>> 
>> Same for res_xmpp, we should move it to res_xmpp.conf.  This would line
>> up with the majority of resource modules config file names.  Like we did
>> for res_corosync.conf.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> As long as things are consistent, then I'm fine with either. It's the usage of motif.conf vs chan_dahdi.conf vs queues.conf that is bothersome.
> 
> Lets come up with a standard for filenames, and switch everything over to using it. I think I would actually prefer things to be motif.conf, dahdi.conf, voicemail.conf, corosync.conf, etc... than to match up with the module name.
> 
Agree with that. The module names are for developers really, not for daily admin work.

> For people implementing, no one really cares what the module name is.
Right.

/O
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2307 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20120828/660094eb/attachment.bin>