[asterisk-dev] Asterisk 11 configuration files

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:11:16AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Paul Belanger
> <paul.belanger at polybeacon.com> wrote:
> > I'm slowly starting to testing Asterisk 11 and noticed something about our
> > new modules config file names:
> >
> > chan_motif.so -> motif.conf
> >
> > and
> >
> > res_corosync.so -> res_corosync.conf
> > res_xmpp.so -> xmpp.conf
> >
> > When chan_dahdi was rewritten we moved to chan_dahdi.conf. Should we do the
> > same for chan_motif -> chan_motif.conf?
> >
> > Same for res_xmpp, we should move it to res_xmpp.conf.  This would line up
> > with the majority of resource modules config file names.  Like we did for
> > res_corosync.conf.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> 
> +1 from me.  I like the module name == config file name convention and
> think all new modules with config files should follow it.

I must point out I still don't like that new convention and prefer
'motif.conf'. Module names are a mostly internal implementation detail. On the
asterisk CLI, do you have 'chan_motif' or 'motif'?

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir