[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] chan_sip registertrying lacks a global option

wdoekes reviewboard at asterisk.org
Mon Oct 24 15:51:50 CDT 2011


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1540/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for Asterisk Developers.


Summary
-------

Regarding my (*) at:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2011-October/051868.html

I did a little tweaking to the 100-on-REG functionality:

(1) Check peer->flags, not p->flags. The peer object holds the details about whether the user wants the extra 100.
(2) Added a global option, so registertrying=yes|no can be set in [general]
(3) Defaulted the global option to OFF
(4) Updated the alwaysauthreject-default comment which was reversed. (The boolean was changed, but the comment wasn't.)
(5) Move SIP_PAGE2_REGISTERTRYING to bit 29 because bit 24 was actually in use by T38 options (spotted by Pavel Troller a couple of weeks ago)

There is the issue left that the registertrying= option has the same username-disclosure-potential as the nat=yes that is being discussed in http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2011-October/051848.html . One could argue that the only the global option should be kept and the per-peer option could be removed.

I don't have an opinion about this. I would set it to off by default and I've never needed it to be on.


Diffs
-----

  /trunk/channels/chan_sip.c 342060 
  /trunk/channels/sip/include/sip.h 342060 

Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1540/diff


Testing
-------

I've tested the 4 combinations and they work.


Thanks,

wdoekes

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20111024/863cfb61/attachment.htm>


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list