[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] Convert res_musiconhold to use generic timing interface
Russell Bryant
russell at digium.com
Fri Jul 30 15:18:28 CDT 2010
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/826/#review2510
-----------------------------------------------------------
/trunk/res/res_musiconhold.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/826/#comment5534>
I don't think any other usage of the timing API does a read() on the fd and expects it to block like this. I would rather see this changed to be consistent with other timing API usage. Other places poll() on the fd, and when poll() indicates input is available, you should call ast_timer_ack() instead of read().
/trunk/res/res_musiconhold.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/826/#comment5535>
I don't think 50 is right. I believe 25 is what is equivalent to the old code.
- Russell
On 2010-07-30 15:09:07, Sean Bright wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/826/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2010-07-30 15:09:07)
>
>
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and Russell Bryant.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> This patch intends to remove res_musiconhold's dependency on DAHDI. I feel like the conversion was a bit naive, but it works here.
>
>
> This addresses bug 17726.
> https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17726
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /trunk/res/res_musiconhold.c 280623
>
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/826/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Compiles and I can send a caller into MusicOnHold() and everything sounds fine. Only tested with res_timing_dahdi.so, however.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list