[asterisk-dev] 1.8 commit criteria

[Philip Prindeville]

  On 7/21/10 7:26 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 7/21/10 5:20 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 00:48 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>>>> So, maybe it should be postponed to the next version? When would
>>>> that
>>>> be?
>>>>
>>>> 1.6.0: Branched: Jan 18 2008, Released: Oct 01 21:22:08 2008
>>>> 1.6.1: Branched: Aug 13 2008, Released: Aug 18 20:42:51 2009
>>>> 1.6.2: Branched: Mar 16 2009, Released: Dec 17 20:31:38 2009
>>>>
>>>> So does this mean an extra delay of 6-9 monthes in case it goes
>>>> into
>>>> 1.10 instead (Assuming somebody actually properly picks it up by
>>>> then)?
>>> Yeah, something like that. I have had some discussions about major
>>> projects targeted at 1.10, but there have been no discussions
>>> regarding
>>> a schedule. That's still up in the air at this point. A lot of that
>>> depends on what things we would all like to accomplish for the next
>>> release.
>>>
>> Well, so that I can't be told I sat on it too long, I'd like to ask
>> that it get on the roadmap for the next release. :-)
> It seems reasonable that this is something that we (Digium) could get to by the next release, at least.  It's definitely something people want.
>
> Of course, as with all patches, community driven testing, documenting, etc., will make it happen sooner.

Yup.  Agreed.  And I'm willing to help with all that.

It just popped up on my radar too late for me to do any good.